CSE | STGX | | CSE Listing ↗

Analysis: Biden’s EV minerals cash fruitless without permitting reform

Originally Posted on Mining.com


By Ernest Scheyder; Editing by David Gregorio

Washington’s growing financial support for companies that produce metals used in electric vehicles will likely prove fruitless unless the federal government streamlines the mine permitting process, investors, executives and consultants told Reuters.

President Joe Biden last week doled out $2.8 billion to miners developing new US sources of lithium, nickel, copper and other EV minerals, as well as battery parts manufacturers and recyclers. Those grants followed August’s Inflation Reduction Act, which links EV tax credits to minerals extracted domestically or from 20 allies.

Both measures aim to spur domestic mining and push the country closer to Biden’s goal for half of all new US vehicles to be electric by 2030.

But it currently takes a decade or longer to obtain a US mining permit, an arduous process that frustrates miners who welcome the financial support but want more permitting transparency. Biden’s administration has also opposed permits for several proposed mines.

“The US government is saying ‘Go! Go! Go!,’ but the environmental review process is extremely cumbersome,” said Jerry Hicks at the Optica Rare Earths & Critical Materials ETF, which holds shares of Albemarle Corp, Freeport-McMoRan Inc and Glencore Plc.

“China has the infrastructure in place, and it’s going to take a long time for the US to get anywhere close.”

Related: US to support new mines that avoid ‘historical injustices’, Biden says

Senator Joe Manchin, a West Virginia Democrat, failed to push permitting reform through Congress last month, though he is expected to try again later this year.

“What I would like, if I could ask for something, is predictability,” said Arne Frandsen, chief executive of mining investment group Pallinghurst and a director at Talon Metals Corp, which received $114.8 million from Biden to partially fund a nickel processing plant in North Dakota that will supply Tesla Inc.

“It’s difficult to get capital to commit if you don’t know if you’ll get a permit in 12 months or five years.”

Some projects receiving government funding may have an easier path to permitting than others. Recycling plants, for example, are more akin to manufacturing operations than open-pit mines.

Privately-held Nth Cycle Inc is building a recycling plant in the US Midwest expected to be producing 5,000 tonnes of nickel annually by 2025. That is about when the only current US nickel mine prepares to close.

“People have a misconception about how quickly we can get mines up and running given the US permitting process,” said Megan O’Connor, Nth Cycle’s CEO.

Albemarle is betting that the $149.7 million grant it won last week will ease its path to obtain permits to reopen a mothballed North Carolina lithium mine.

“Hopefully, they’ll give us some help and fast track some of the permitting process,” said Kent Masters, Albemarle’s CEO.

Yet most proposed US mining projects would be new mines that face widespread pushback, several from Biden himself.

Lithium Americas Corp’s efforts to build the largest US lithium mine are mired in a court battle. Piedmont Lithium Inc, which received $141.7 million from Biden, faces opposition to its North Carolina mining project.

“What really needs to happen is not for permitting to be relaxed, but to be expedited to ensure we can build the mines that can supply the automakers,” said Jordan Roberts, a minerals analyst at consultancy Fastmarkets.

Permitting delays may paradoxically keep EV prices high by limiting the domestic supply of minerals needed to reduce battery prices, said Hicks of the Optica Rare Earths & Critical Materials ETF.

The yawning divide between America and China’s approaches to funding the EV supply chain is now a top concern for many policymakers and their advisers in the nation’s capital.

“Unless you can break ground on these sites, you’re not going to be able to take advantage of those funds,” said Abigail Wulf at SAFE, an energy-focused think tank.

About StrategX

StrategX is a Canadian-based exploration company focused on discovering energy transition metals in northern Canada. With five strategic projects situated on the East Arm of the Great Slave Lake, Northwest Territories, and the Melville Peninsula, Nunavut, we’re leading discovery in untapped regions. This first-mover advantage in underexplored regions presents a unique opportunity for investors to be part of multiple discoveries and the development of new districts for critical metals essential for the global green energy shift. For updates and the latest insights, explore our Investor Portal.

This news release does not constitute an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy any of the securities in the United States of America. The securities have not been and will not be registered under the United States Securities Act of 1933 (the “1933 Act”) or any state securities laws and may not be offered or sold within the United States or to U.S. Persons (as defined in the 1933 Act) unless registered under the 1933 Act and applicable state securities laws or an exemption from such registration is available.

 

On Behalf of the Board of Directors

Darren G. Bahrey
CEO, President & Director


For further information, please contact:

StrategX Elements Corp.
Email: info@strategXcorp.com
Phone: 604-379-5515

For further information about the Company, please visit our website at www.strategXcorp.com

Neither the Canadian Securities Exchange nor its regulations services accept responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this release.

Disclaimer for Forward-Looking Information

All statements included in this press release that address activities, events, or developments that the Company expects, believes, or anticipates will or may occur in the future are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements involve numerous assumptions made by the Company based on its experience, perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected future developments and other factors it believes are appropriate in the circumstances. In addition, these statements involve substantial known and unknown risks and uncertainties that contribute to the possibility that the predictions, forecasts, projections, and other forward-looking statements will prove inaccurate, certain of which are beyond the Company’s control. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements. Except as required by law, the Company does not intend to revise or update these forward-looking statements after the date hereof or revise them to reflect the occurrence of future unanticipated events.

Share the Post:

Related Posts